SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Taro who wrote (273409)2/11/2006 12:54:29 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575489
 
Arkansas politicians are fighting over tax revenue surpluses; what they should do with them...

one of many articles on google..
arkansasnews.com



To: Taro who wrote (273409)2/11/2006 1:15:30 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575489
 
It has been reported before, and by a couple of posters on this board (incl. me), that the GWB new tax cuts already was boosting the total treasury tax intake last year.

You need to be a little careful there. Lowering something like capitol gains tax rate very much encourages transactions which result in capitol gains, especially near the juncture of change from high rate to low rate. The OMB and others projecting tax consequences have long tended to use static estimates, that is they don't look at the rate of change of behavior X due to a law change. So their estimates are often off for that reason.

The problem with capitol gains laws in the USA is that they inhibit transactions. Lowering the tax rate allows more flexibility with transactions. It should have been analyzed from that POV rather than from a static POV wrt to transactions.

However, the real reason that capitol gains tax revenue has increased is largely that the last few years have become more favorable to asset inflation, and people are extracting some of that via taxable transactions.

This is simply a fact of the last several years, such as a jobless recovery (first significant one with declining job participation rate for the USA), and enormous extraction of wealth from real estate equity. You have to pay some attention to the underlying reason for things, or you can easily believe what you want to believe.



To: Taro who wrote (273409)2/11/2006 1:49:06 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575489
 
Iraq is kept as an off-the-books expense. It's the only way the chimp Caesar can fake a "surplus".