Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shades who wrote (53550)	2/12/2006 7:52:31 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 110194

amazing those kids will likely be scarred sharon stone is no longer pretty and ought to retire

To: shades who wrote (53550)	2/12/2006 8:12:00 PM
From: ChrisJP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 110194

An analysis by Salary.com found that today's 5.4 million stay-at-home moms would earn $131,471 in annual salary, including overtime pay, if they were doing the same work for an employer. I have a lot of respect for people who take care of their children and home related responsibilities, and I know the job is under appreciated, but that $131,471 figure is a load of crap. Every single stay-at-home activity is worth maybe $15/hour for 10 hours per day. Times 50 weeks/year amounts to $37,500. On Saturdays, when I cut the grass for 2 hours, I don't add $40/week to my salary. I don't add chauffer's pay to my salary because I drive myself to work either. And so on. Chris