Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (273874)	2/13/2006 3:15:30 AM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 1574094

is it your own definition? So now UN defines the words in English? It's just my understanding of the word, which might be incorrect. But i think it is the general understanding of the word. Asked the person next to me whether he thought Jews or Gypsies were nationalities, and he said no. The UN doesn't define English, but it is the closest thing we've got to defining nations, and most people (I think) would define nationality as the nation where one is from or where one is now. I guess a better question would be about Tibetans, since they do have a clear land area but no nation. And my hunch is that if asked whether Tibetan was a nationality or an ethnic group, non-stakeholders (people who are neither Tibetan nor Chinese) would answer ethnic group.