SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (58112)2/14/2006 12:06:33 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362361
 
Companies in Emerging Markets Show Clout in Global Deal Game

By JASON SINGER and DENNIS K. BERMAN
The Wall Street Journal
February 13, 2006; Page A1
online.wsj.com

Companies from emerging markets, armed with piles of cash from rising commodity prices and abundant financing, are snapping up targets in Europe and the U.S., a trend that could shift the global economic balance of power in some industries.

In the latest example, shareholders of ports operator Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co. are scheduled to meet today to vote on a $6.8 billion takeover by Dubai Ports World, a company backed by the government in Dubai, one of the seven emirates in the oil-rich United Arab Emirates.

The deal is expected to be approved, ending a three-month bidding war for P&O, one of Britain's oldest companies, between the Dubai company and one from Singapore. If shareholders sign off, the top three global ports operators will be based outside the U.S. and Europe.

Europe especially has been targeted by buyers from emerging markets recently. Last year, companies from the Middle East, Latin America, Asia and other regions spent more than $42 billion on deals there -- more than twice as much as in 2004.

So far this year, companies from emerging markets have announced deals valued at a total of $9.3 billion in Europe, which tops the total for all of 2003, according to research firm Dealogic.

In the U.S., companies from emerging markets spent more than $14 billion on 96 deals in 2005. That passed the previous record of about $10 billion, set in 2000. Among the better-known purchases here was the $1.25 billion acquisition by China's Lenovo Group Ltd. of the personal-computer division of International Business Machines Corp.

Bankers and executives say the latest wave is being driven by a host of new factors. One is an excess of cash, generated in part from the soaring price of oil and other commodities in recent months. Many buyers are backed by national governments that are looking to invest their newfound riches in other industries that will help diversify their economic base or provide new distribution outlets for their exports.

Economic conditions have changed, too. At the same time that once closed countries like China and India have opened up their economies, hedge funds are controlling ever-wider stakes of public companies in Europe and the U.S., and generally are neutral about who buys their holdings.

Moreover, companies from several emerging-markets economies have grown larger and more powerful than many outsiders had realized, said Peter Tague, head of European mergers and acquisitions at New York investment bank Citigroup Inc. "These guys have been consolidating their local markets without anyone paying much attention, and now they're aggressive players on the world stage," he said.

Last year, for instance, Egyptian billionaire Naguib Sawiris bought a controlling stake in Italian mobile and fixed-line phone operator Wind Telecommunicazioni from Italian utility Enel SpA. The deal, which valued Wind at more than $12 billion, was Mr. Sawiris's first foray into Europe after acquisitions across Asia and the Middle East. Mr. Sawiris received massive loans from European banks and sold a bond to finance the deal, while giving Enel a stake in his Egyptian mobile-phone business Orascom Telecom.

Even companies that haven't benefited from high energy prices have been buoyed by an influx of money into their local stock markets from western investors chasing better returns than they can get at home. Higher stock prices enable companies to more easily raise cash from shareholders and to persuade banks to lend to them at low interest rates.

India's benchmark index climbed around 50% in the past 12 months, for instance, so many Indian companies went shopping. During that period, auto-parts maker Bharat Forge Ltd. bought Imatra Kilsta AB of Sweden, petrochemical company Reliance Industries took control of Trevira GmbH in Germany and consumer-electronics concern the Videocon group snapped up the picture-tube business of France's Thomson SA.

In late December, after Indian technology company Wipro Ltd. purchased one company in Europe and one in the U.S., a senior Wipro executive told Dow Jones Newswires that the technology giant is looking to buy more software services businesses in the U.S., Europe and the Asia-Pacific region with its cash reserves of $718 million.

Just last week, Indian generics-drug maker Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. said it is bidding against local pharmaceutical rival Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. to acquire Betapharm Arzneimittel GmbH, a German drug maker.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (58112)2/14/2006 5:29:15 PM
From: J.B.C.  Respond to of 362361
 
Ahhh yes grasshopper, you must read this man's advice... after all he believes himself to be the smartest person on SI.

In fact if you'd followed this person prediction on this post:
Message 18793019
about Japan's economy about to go South and bought (on the very day of this post) a Japan index ETF (Exchange Traded Fund) EWJ, you would have more than doubled your returns. It is uncanny that he marked the bottom.

Ahhh yes grasshopper it is wise to follow this man's rhetoric, but not his investment advice...

But high priest, this man is paid for his investment advice, how can this be?

Grasshopper, just because you say you're an investment genius, doesn't make it so.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (58112)2/14/2006 5:35:50 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362361
 
The Information is in the Divergences

By John P. Hussman, Ph.D.

February 13, 2006

Investors familiar with the academic literature of finance are sometimes surprised that, having spent years teaching economics and finance at the University of Michigan, I would place any weight at all on “technical” indicators. The explanation is that my economic views are based on theory involving topics like “asymmetrical information,” “rational expectations,” “signal extraction” and “general equilibrium” – stuff that hasn't, in my view, fully made it into the finance literature.

...Continued at: hussmanfunds.com