Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ivan Inkling who wrote (53797)	2/14/2006 9:00:22 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

<< when they have not [sic] response [sic] they attack and never truly [sic] answer the questions about [sic] why they support this president.>> Actually... 1. The question asked was answered directly. 2. Nobody was attacked, unless you call asking questions an attack. 3. And finally, he never asked a question about why people "support this president", so complaining about not getting an answer to a question that was never asked is a bit odd. This thread is like a kindergarten conversation. The lefty wack jobs don't know what they are asking, don't read the responses, and then go on temper tantrums.

To: Ivan Inkling who wrote (53797)	2/14/2006 11:15:27 AM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 93284

QUICK LIBERAL MEDIA CONTRAST Tim Graham The Corner The Washington Post did their original front-page Monday news story on Quailgate? Check. Today, another front-page story questioning the slow alerting of the media? Check. Outraged unsigned Post editorial? Check. Outraged column by liberal Eugene Robinson? Check. Two Style section pieces to lead off the Beltway buzz? Check. Anything on Al Gore's America-bashing speech in Saudi Arabia? Not in the paper, yesterday or today. corner.nationalreview.com