Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonkie who wrote (73302)	2/15/2006 1:35:06 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

What I mean by "almost certainly" is "almost certainly," IMHO. That's not a hoot, but rather a very logical guess supported by the evidence. Ok, I'll bite, I'm NOT an O'REALly independent, and truly can't stand his oft seen hypocrisy (though I seldom watch him much anymore), as I see it. Finally, someone brings up the ONE question which on the surface demands an answer. Unlike the totally biased here, I'll accept a simple answer, barring evidence to the contrary. A coverup is highly unlikely, it seems, given that it was all reported right away. Were there one, it would logically involve pretending the shooter was someone else. There were friendly witnesses to back up any imagined coverup planned, and there was therefore likely nothing to lose by letting a traumatized VP - who'd NOT denied his part, who LET it be reported, who INSTRUCTED the ranch owner to give out the scoop - to talk in the morning. Maybe they were all drunk? If that's a fact which is being covered up, we'll likely never know, IMHO. Dan B.