SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Claude Cormier who wrote (6609)2/15/2006 2:54:48 PM
From: jpthoma1  Respond to of 78416
 
Agree too!

;o)

What I wanted to express is that the best way to play the Island Gold mine start up was to buy PAT instead of RIC.

But RIC is definitively a better long term play.

JP



To: Claude Cormier who wrote (6609)2/15/2006 3:04:49 PM
From: jpthoma1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78416
 
Let's say it another way.

If new results at Island Pond increase the NPV of the future production by $10 millions, theorically PAT market cap will increase by $4,5 million (16%) and RIC by $5,5 millions (6%).

So the short term return will be better on PAT shares.

JP



To: Claude Cormier who wrote (6609)2/16/2006 7:47:24 AM
From: karead  Respond to of 78416
 
Keeping in mind that if anybody gets bought out, it will be RIC buying PAT...not the other way around. I'll stick with PAT...