Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Cheney Shoots Ducks (and a person) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (411)	2/15/2006 3:30:24 PM
From: worksinjammies	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1307

Well apparently you didn't read the post. The point is, there is no organized middle, therefore a discussion on an organized moderate position is truly hypothetical. I had made the assumption that yours was not a rhetorical question, therefore I gave a detailed answer to my thought on the position. I have to think by your last well thought out response that you have chosen a side, which is the point of my previous notion that choosing a "side" does not truly address the issues. If that side is "Republican," I will say that the current administration had bastardized the true Republican ideals...on this topic I could go on and on... If your side is "Democrat," I would also say that they have lost the pulse of mainstream American, and have fallen to a state of utter confusion and indivuals that act on their own personal interests rather than a true party ideal. Again, these are generalizations, but the point is clear. BTW: I think Cheney AND Kennedy are buffoons. Enough said on that. As to your comment: In other words you are just blowing smoke rings. OK, thanks anyway. I simply say that almost every post (some notable exceptions) on this thread have been mostly smoke blowing. It is pointless for me to write a dissertation of my opinion and reasoning if the responses or rebuttals are so full of reasoning and conjecture. Sorry, I prefer actual discourse to rhetoric. Regards, WIJ