SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The DD Maven -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: im a survivor who wrote (194)2/15/2006 8:49:53 PM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 736
 
Since we're all friends, I want you and rrm to realize that blaming Creede is similar to blaming the victims of terror for terrorism, just because they cried out in pain or went to their offices on the day of the cowardly attack.

Creede is not the enemy. The slimey, disgraced, slithering, cowardly personal attackers who pretend to be for freedom of anonymous speech on the internet are quick to attack, threaten, and use every imaginable scumball tactic to put a company in a bad light and to put those who post their opinions for that company in the same aura. From the moronic to the corrupt, we see it over and over, whether it be the hypocrite or the convicted former guru, the extorionist, the liar, the defamer. NONE OF THESE CAN BE APPLIED IN ANY FASHION TO CREEDE!!

The answer is not to turn off the light, not to blame someone who wants to shed light on corporate governance. The answer is found in facts, in truth. I don't follow PLNI to any great degree but Creede has said that IF they show that the shares have been issued for value that enhances the business, that audits come through, etc., then he would agree that he had been perhaps premature or a bit too verbose. However, he was not wrong in what he said, in the factual content of what he said with respect to the company itself. (Some of the personal comments back and forth were probably the type that many of us do and then wish we hadn't because of emotion. So let's stick with the facts. After all none of us, KG, rrm or me are strangers to "hot" posting and not backing down when we think we are right!!)

Creede's primary objection was to the claim of reducing shares, when in actuality shares were increased. I'm no basher, but I don't see any way of reconciling those 2 statements without a very clear statement from the company that the shares were issued for very specific corporate purposes that can be explained with numbers, numbers that translate into value. Without that, the company has put its shareholders, and its activist ones, such as both of you and Creede, in a very precarious position. Because you don't have the information that you need, you are subject to the cowardly terrorist-like slime ball sleezey tactics to which you have been subjected. It's not Creede that has created that environment.

A moron, one who perhaps has a history of NASD violations, can set up a blog, call himself a "reasearch department" and hound good honorable people like rrm, a person who IMO has NOT been supported by the company he defends. Support from a company does not mean insider information. But when a deadline is detailed, it should be met. When a statement is made, it should be honored. Weasel words that dilution would have been greater without a buyback is just that and I'm sure we all agree that weasel wormy slimey crawling misinformation is what we have come to expect from the slippery fingers of a disgraced blogger rather than from the CEO of a company which desires the support of its loyal shareholders.

And I hope we're all still "friends" after this post. The enemy is clear here. You need to look down, see it slithering in its hole, hiding behind the keyboard. Step on it and crush it, bury it in its hole with the slime that emanates from its corrupt innards.



To: im a survivor who wrote (194)2/15/2006 8:50:10 PM
From: Carl Brehm  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 736
 
PLNI, is just playing the game the way 99% of the pennylander's do. The trick for us little investers is to play it with them. If Creede does not learn this he will not make it here.

JMHO



To: im a survivor who wrote (194)3/8/2006 4:43:29 PM
From: waitless  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 736
 
In other words, "pennyland is a license to steal so quit complaining about it or trying to change it." I disagree and I plan to do what I can to hold whomever I can accountable.

It doesn't cost much money to open your books or publish somewhat detailed financials. Nor does it cost much to NOT gag your TA. The example companies Creede mentioned could have taken numerous low-cost measures to keep the investors informed. They chose not to.