Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The DD Maven -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrm_bcnu who wrote (198)	2/16/2006 12:15:44 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 736

I understand totally. The important thing is the truth. Without the truth, you fall into the world of the disgraced, cowardly, off premises blogger, who seems to be the primary source of information for the guru posterior lickers and hypocrite pretending internet freedom of speech posters. Can you imagine how upset he must be? The old coot is just drooling, having been booted from the real boards, he makes up his own web site. LOL. How funny is that? And he must have read all the cool names and descriptions in my prior post as he seems to read every post. But you and others have uncovered his impotence, his cowardice and I salute you for that. That NASD penalty citation was very interesting. And even Zwebner made a fool out of him. Listen, no matter what, you guys have been honorable and my thoughts were more that PLNI had kind of hung you out to dry and this helped this slimey creature. It wasn't Creede's posts that did it. I appreciate his DD and don't want to discourage the posting of the truth. Knowing the truth and getting truthful information from CEO's gives us an advantage in this very difficult but potentially very successful game.

To: rrm_bcnu who wrote (198)	2/16/2006 12:23:35 AM
From: creede	Respond to of 736

Rick, I have no malice towards any of you fellows(jmh included). What I wrote was more of an over flow of powerful emotions. I went through the emotional wringer last year with all of the stocks that I listed. I had holdings in PLNI, RSHN, and VWKM. I never really purchased any FCDH, but they "opened my eyes", if you will, to the gaping hole in the system. I discovered that they had recently done a reverse split(1 for 10,000) after selling 300 billion shares. Then I saw moronic pumpers running from thread to thread saying that they had this huge deal with the Fight Channel, and they were going to the moon(truth is they only get a small percentage). This was the beginning of me getting tired of the moronic pumper. IMO, the moronic pumper is worse that the moronic basher. At least the basher isn't trying to talk anyone into putting their money into a bottomless pit. True enough, we are all responsible for our own investments, but I just don't want to hide behind that excuse. "Am I my brother's keeper?"...for me, yes. Do I realize that perhaps 80 to 90 percent of the stocks in the nano's are pump and dumps? Well, perhaps so. That does not mean that I'm going to run in circles screaming buy ABCD, because it's going to the moon. It also does not mean that I can't work hard to find one's that may not be. All I'm asking for is to be able to see the share structure, is that too much to ask? Alright, directly regarding PLNI....honestly, I have no idea what they are up to. I just know that they seem to have done the same things that Astrom did....but you know this. You know, rick, I finally saw that RSHN and VWKM both have real products, but still there was no way I could give them my support any longer. I think both have the potential to grow up and be adult companies, but I saw that they were going to sell billions of shares anyway. IMO, that's what PLNI is doing. They probably have real business, real acquisitions, real auditors, etc, etc, etc, but are selling so many shares that they are just killing the share structure. I have a couple of questions: 1. If they are "in the black", then why did they not secure bank financing, instead of going against they share reduction program? 2. Why did they not just sell 144's? If business is good then it would not be hard, right? Anyway, I never intended to give the bashers ammunition. I think their methods are too malicious, and detracts from their message...but I do see what they are upset about. I really think that John brought this upon himself. He has a bad habit of banning anyone that says something he doesn't like...I guess he banned the wrong dudes..had to happen eventually. If he would have just let them speak, they probably would have gotten bored by now and moved on. It's kinda like Rambo in First Blood. GodBless+NoDoubt cris P.S. If PLNI pulls through then I will be truly sorry for any grief that I have caused....I will try to make amends best I can.