SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (275005)2/17/2006 11:38:38 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578097
 
Nothing to say
"You've seen the coverage of angry Muslims around the world demanding the beheading of newspaper cartoonists who drew images of Mohammed.
"You've heard the State Department's shameful response condemning the artists. Or seen the signs held by 'moderate' Muslims in London reading 'Freedom. Go to Hell!' and 'He Who Offends the Prophet Must Die!'
"What you haven't seen — except in a handful of American papers — are the actual cartoons. ...
"NBC has (as of this writing) refused to show its viewers the cartoons that launched a thousand jihads. CNN has chosen to show them, but blur them to make the images unrecognizable.
"And what about the big papers? The courageous New York Times? Nope. The Washington Post refuses to publish them because, according to the editor, the cartoons violate the standards of 'good taste.' This from the same paper that just ran an editorial cartoon featuring a U.S. soldier with his arms and legs blown off being mocked by Defense Secretary [Donald H.] Rumsfeld. ...
"Our brave, principled journalists are ready to stand and fight against any threat ... that doesn't actually exist. But now that speaking out really matters, our 'defenders of free speech' suddenly have nothing to say."
— Michael Graham, writing on "And some guts wouldn't hurt, either," Tuesday in the Philadelphia Daily News