Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (158015)	2/18/2006 7:53:43 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794279

current primary system Depends upon what you are after. I certainly don't want a "mass vote" system that would lead to a chaotic "total democracy." lindybill@Republic.com

To: goldworldnet who wrote (158015)	2/19/2006 4:29:14 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794279

Well, its true, small states initially get far greater exposure to the candidates and possibly effect the outcome more then their numbers would seem reasonable. But, on the other hand, its far cheaper to campaign in small states and with the broad media coverage anyone, anywhere can learn of the candidates positions at any time. All in all I am ambient about the matter, far more important to me is efforts and laws to make the vote MORE ACCURATE with less chance of CHEATING. I have seen too much just in my little part of the country to not believe the Democrats are involved in heavy duty cheating. I know, people will say they all do, but my experience has NOT been so. jdn