Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.hinton who wrote (18032)	2/21/2006 6:32:11 PM
From: J.B.C.	Respond to of 35834

So this is your smoking gun on Kyoto? Does it occur to you that Exxon conducts climate studies itself? It has to in order to counter the flood of disinformation currently coming in the form of global warming research. Ask a person involved in global warming:what happens to their funding if a study comes out that finds conclusively stating that carbon emissions do not contribute to global warming. I have, in discussion with a CU Boulder Climatologist that had published a totally misleading article in the local Denver Sunday paper. The answer basically is that all their nice research money goes away. See they're being paid to support the theory, They are not being paid to debunk it. Having someone that worked it the climate group from Exxon doesn't concern me any more that say Clinton hiring someone for the same post who was pro "Humans cause Global Warming". See it's BAD if Bush Does it, but it isn't if Clinton did? Do you see that hypocrisy?