SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLNI - Game Over -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: shortsinthesand who wrote (2692)2/20/2006 11:20:55 AM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12518
 
Shitsinthesand, you seem to be getting quite frustrated. If my posts are rambling, I think your last post was even more meandering and did not answer the post I previously made to you.

Where did I ever say my name was NOT Dave. LOL. If I'm not Dave, is that important to the merits of our discusssion. You can't prove YOU'RE Dave after all. I don't think that makes your posts any less "compelling."

Where did I claim that I am an attorney?

So far, you're batting about .000.

Butttttt - It's not about me or you, it's about PLNI. So, let's go forward.

You say that pinksheets says the CEO is a liar? I asked you to show a reference and you don't seem to be able to do that.

I've read the statement on pinksheets.com but I don't see where it says that the CEO is a liar. Since you are a vocal basher here, can't you enlighten the readers where pinksheets.com says anything about the CEO being a liar?

I'm sure someone with your claimed capabilities will be able to back his statement up. So, just to be clear, please post the statement that pinksheets.com says or suspects that the CEO is a liar.

Now, let's talk about your statement of ownership and how it relates to your role here as a basher. You say you bought and have been long since your second purchase in August. Does that mean that you weren't long since your first purchase sometime before that? It's very confusing, you have to admit.

Anyway, let's not quibble. You say your purchase was from a lying PR. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you meant that you bought for a second time because of a PR that you feel is now "a lie." Fair enough.

Now, you've continued to hold all the way down to .003 area despite your contention that the CEO is a liar. Despite the fact that you could have sold much higher before, you continued to hold and began and continue to bash this stock you say that you are significantly long.

Nothing wrong with that, mind you, but it just needs to be explained. After all, the "research deparment" that you seem to defend says that you should disclaim your interest as I previously pointed out to you.

OK - let's continue as I think this is important in understanding how compelling your posts are.

After the stock bottomed in the .003 area and during the coverage of the "research department," which indicated that the stock was a scam, you ignored that "research department," as well as your own claims that the CEO was (as you say) lying, and further ignored statements from pinksheets.com which did NOT say that the CEO was lying,

and YOU CONTINUED TO HOLD LONG, despite the fact that you could have sold for 2x the bottom. I don't know about you, but a double off of a bottom in a very short time is a damn nice move no matter what type of investment.

Is there anything that I have posted that is a lie here? I really want to understand and be friends. If I am lying, please tell me where and also tell me what I have said that is incorrect. Don't just call me a name. It shows that you are a bit upset because you're not getting your message across. I'm trying to help you.

Let's go forward. You say you are still long. So, I take it you are bullish on the stock? Why are you bullish? How high do you think the stock will go? You didn't sell at .007 so I gather you feel that it is going higher than that. Do you think it will break the penny range and then take off? Where would you sell .02, .05????

I'm not sure how longs will react but so far I bet they welcomed your posts as a basher. Perhaps, you can do better now that we both understand that you are a bullish poster.

Thanks again for your most "interesting" posts.