Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (726873)	2/20/2006 10:14:23 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

My house also is worth about 4x's what I paid for it, but I bought in 1980. All this means nothing to me as if I were to sell, I would just end up paying someone else 4x's what they paid for their house if it were same age plus my property taxes would skyrocket. For this reason I dont thing there should be ANY tax on real estate gains. Most of it is purely due to inflation unless you have a home with limited available property such as Ocean front. jdn

To: Bill who wrote (726873)	2/20/2006 11:07:43 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

Scientific evidence that political anger is dangerous. BY ARTHUR C. BROOKS Monday, February 20, 2006 12:01 a.m. EST The Republican National Committee chairman publicly criticized Sen. Hillary Clinton after a series of intemperate remarks on her part, saying she "seems to have a lot of anger." While it made the news, this was hardly an earth-shattering observation. The criticism was also ironic, given that anger has become a standard tool for both parties. In fact, overheated political rhetoric has become so ordinary that most of us don't even take it seriously. But we should. When one party's chairman calls the other party "criminal" (as one actually did recently, and the other might before this page goes to press), he is hoping to pull people to the fringe where they will be reliable voters. There is some evidence that this tactic is working: The percentage of people willing to say they are "extremely liberal" or "extremely conservative" is higher than it has been in over 30 years. And the data tell us that the people with these strong views often display a disturbing lack of compassion and ethics in their personal relations. As such, angry politics may be spilling over into our broader culture. To begin with, there is abundant evidence that extreme political opinions lead to the personal demonization of fellow citizens. Consider, for example, how those on the far left and far right respond when asked for a zero-to-100 score of their feelings toward people with whom they disagree politically. Political scientists find that scores below 20 on these so-called feeling thermometers are very unusual--except on the political fringes. Indeed, according to the 2004 National Election Study, one in five "extremely liberal" people gave conservatives a score of zero, a temperature you or I might reserve for Osama bin Laden. The same percentage of "extremely conservative" people gave liberals a zero. Ironically, these angry folks tend to feel that they are more compassionate than others--while their personal actions tell a different story. Take people on the far left. According to the General Social Surveys in 2002 and 2004, those who say they're "extremely liberal" are 20 percentage points more likely than moderates to say they feel concern for less fortunate people. But this doesn't appear to translate well to a deep concern for any individual: This group is also 20 points less likely than moderates to say they'd "endure all things for the one I love." To some, this might support the stereotype that the far left loves humanity--but only in large groups. Like extreme liberals, extreme conservatives are more compassionate in theory than in practice: They are slightly more likely than centrists to say they "feel protective of people who are taken advantage of." Unless, it seems, they are the ones taking advantage: It turns out they are substantially less likely than moderates to act honestly in small ways, such as returning change mistakenly given them by a cashier. It may or may not be that extreme politics is by itself what makes a person angry and uncompassionate; but it certainly cannot be improving the situation. After all, the partisan political machine today is geared toward the destruction of opponents--to convince us that the other side is not just misguided, but evil. Mounting evidence that adherence to extreme political attitudes correlates with a fundamental lack of compassion is not encouraging for the future of our civic culture, as long as rage is used as a political device. For our political leaders, a bit of anger management would be in the public interest. Mr. Brooks is a professor at Syracuse University's Maxwell School of Public Affairs. opinionjournal.com

To: Bill who wrote (726873)	2/20/2006 12:32:14 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 769670

There are many communities where "tax refugees" from high-tax states have moved into low-tax states and driven up real estate values. It's a HUGE trend between California and the western states near it. If the Mid-West and New England ever figure this out, look for a high rate of economic growth in those regions. Unfortunately, since those states are held hostage by their teachers' unions and bureaucrats (supported by idiots like Anderson) the needed reforms have a very low probability of taking root, and even newly-elected Republican governors manage to sell out to the greedy bastards early on (see Evans in Indiana, Guinn in Nevada, and many others.)...

To: Bill who wrote (726873)	2/20/2006 1:03:45 PM
From: JBTFD	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

CPI doesn't include the cost of buying a house. Their cost of housing measurement is called owners equivalent rent and measures the cost of renting. So CPI is irrelevant as far as housing prices are concerned. Of course if they did put actual housing prices in CPI we would be seeing big inflation and all the costs that are indexed to CPI would also rise dramatically. There is a built in motive to keep the stated inflation numbers low. It keeps government costs lower.