SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: illyia who wrote (58883)2/21/2006 11:29:17 AM
From: zonkie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362361
 
Since almost all of juniors platform is either dead, unpopular or a disaster he is now seizing on parts of the democrats platform. He is trying to sell himself this week as the energy president. Please forget about such things as the "war president" and the "medicare reform president" and the "social security reform president."

He is so concerned about energy research that he is traveling to Golden Colorado today to deliver one of his lectures on energy dependence. He is also so concerned about making people believe his bullshit that he hired back 8 of the 32 workers which were laid off there 2 weeks ago because he cut their budget by 28 million.

---------------------------

a few bits of evidence of where junior really stands on energy..........

1)Just days before the final Congressional vote on the controversial energy bill, the Environmental Protection Agency held back an annual report on automotive fuel economy. A copy of the report, leaked to the media, shows that loosened fuel economy regulations allow carmakers to produce vehicles with an average of 6 percent less fuel efficiency than cars made in the 1980s. Both domestic and foreign automotive companies are blamed for the reduction, partly ascribed to their focus on production of heavy, sport-utility vehicles and more powerful engines. The report notes that carmakers are not likely to improve fuel economy in the near future. Some 40 percent of America's domestic oil consumption is the result of fuel for trucks and cars, and yet the energy bill does nothing to prod automakers to improve gasoline mileage. In a similar vein, the energy bill also makes no provisions to encourage more efficient vehicles, despite EPA's conclusion that "fuel economy is directly related to energy security."

"Delaying the report's release is merely another Bush-league political tactic to avoid scrutiny on this administration's lack of interest in reducing America's dangerous dependence on oil," said Dan Lashof, science director of NRDC's Climate Center.


2) The Department of Energy delayed implementation of new energy-efficiency standards for residential central air conditioners and heat pumps, residential clothes washers, residential water heaters, and commercial heating and cooling equipment. These standards would cut millions of tons of global warming pollution, improve electric system reliability, save consumers and businesses more than $19 billion through 2030, and save the equivalent of the power produced by 91 new power plants.

Although the administration ultimately retained the new standards for clothes washers and water heaters, on April 13, it announced its intention to substantially weaken the air conditioner standard. Weakening the standard would increase electric demand by more than 14,000 megawatts nationally, increasing strain on the nation's power system. Fourteen thousand megawatts is equal to the output of more than 50 medium-sized power plants.

3)The Bush administration has proposed new fuel economy standards for the "light trucks" category based on vehicle size rather than the weight-based classification currently in place. Under the existing Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency standard, all SUVs, pickups and minivans are required to average 21 miles per gallon (compared to passenger cars which must average 27.5 miles per gallon). By the year 2007, these bigger vehicles must meet an average of 22.2 mpg. Critics, scoffing at the administration's claims that the new standards will ease oil consumption, say the changes in fact provide little impetus for American automakers to create more energy-efficient automobiles.

The changes to CAFE, which would begin to take effect in 2008, would require the smallest category of light trucks to maintain a fuel efficiency of 28.4 miles per gallon, and the largest category to maintain an efficiency of 21.3 mpg. However, large trucks and SUVs, including the gas-guzzling Hummer, would be exempt from the new CAFE requirements. Additionally, adjusting the models of some cars by one or two inches could propel them into a higher classification, thus reducing the need to increase their fuel efficiency.

Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta claims that the CAFE changes will save 10 billion gallons of gasoline (roughly 25 days worth of consumption), but environmentalists note that that figure is spread over a period of 15 years. As it stands, Americans used nearly 140 billion gallons of gas in 2004, meaning that the projected gasoline savings would amount to a drop in the bucket -- especially if gasoline consumption continues to increase. Detroit automakers continue to fight stricter fuel efficiency regulations, complaining that it would cost too much to retool cars to get better gas mileage.

"The Bush administration's new standards won't save much oil and, in fact, provide a loophole for the biggest gas guzzlers like the GM Hummer. Even worse, this plan gives automakers an incentive to boost the size of their vehicles to avoid higher fuel economy standards," said Deron Lovaas, director of NRDC's oil savings initiatives.

nrdc.org