Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (158701)	2/22/2006 8:37:15 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794346

So then they coexist by wiping each other out? I hardly see that as a good way to go. I'm grateful that I'm not responsible for the outcome. It's a conundrum of the highest order. I think we can impose democracy, but not if we insist on being politically correct until it takes root. Bad guys are going to have to go. If they don't want to make it work, bye bye!

To: carranza2 who wrote (158701)	2/22/2006 8:50:42 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 794346

Al quada backed sunnis along with baathists and angry sunni street vs Iranian backed shiaa plus angry al sadr. This is a battle we want to avoid. Only thing they have in common is that they blame us. We pulled the plug on saddam and this is now where we are. Our chief goal now if this gets any worse is how to keep our folks safe. At least we got the Kurds and perhaps we can influence the turks to cede territory to the new kurdistan (fat chance) and hope that the iranians and syrians will also cede their kurd area (fatter chance). Oh well.