SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rande Is who wrote (57306)2/22/2006 10:06:18 PM
From: PJr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57584
 
Rande,

I'm still undecided about this issue. The "shoe bomber" was a British citizen and we didn't seem to make an issue out of that link to the British who were managing our ports before they sold to the UAE. There are all kinds of links one can cite to exclude anyone but the good ol' US of A to be operating everything we have.

It's an emotional issue so it's difficult to sort out whether both critics and supporters are politically motivated, or merely driven by public opinion. Without a doubt it's a difficult position to be in for politicians who generally can't can't come to an intellectual conclusion on their own anyway. It's fairly easy to be swayed by an emotional argument. If the UAE is being cooperative with the war on terror, it would be a shame to turn them away by more or less declaring that US-UAE cooperation is a one-way street. On the other hand, it just might be dangerous to have them in charge of anything so potentially vulnerable.

The only thing that I can weigh in on with an opinion is that "W" shouldn't have drawn his gun from the holster and threatened a veto before trying to make his case through a civil debate. The path he chose only drew the battle lines and DEFINITELY made it a political issue. As a result, the correct decision may never prevail since all dialogue now is emotionally/politically charged as opposed to intellectually charged.

...but, as usual, what do I know?

Pat



To: Rande Is who wrote (57306)2/22/2006 11:09:28 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 57584
 
- The UAE was one of three countries in the world to recognize the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.

- After 9/11, the Treasury Department reported that the UAE was not cooperating in efforts to track down Osama Bin Laden’s bank accounts.

- According to the FBI, money was transferred to the 9/11 hijackers through the UAE banking system.

- Two of the 9/11 hijackers were from the UAE (Fayez Banihammad and Marwan al-Shehhi)

- The UAE has been a key transfer point for illegal shipments of nuclear components to Iran, North Korea and Lybia.



To: Rande Is who wrote (57306)2/23/2006 10:42:57 AM
From: Jack Russell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57584
 
Dubai is the best friend we have in the region. They have outwardly supported us in the Iraq war and the war on terror... They have caught and extradited Terrorists... They have let us use bases in there country for our military... They let us set up a CIA station in their country...
It would seem to me if we are trying to build up friendships and trust in the middle East this is the wrong direction to go in.
Where this "issue" will hurt us is not with the uneducated masses rioting at the instigation of Middle East fascists and their allies, it will hurt us with precisely the portion of the Arab/Muslim population that is most sympathetic to our goals in that part of the world.... The educated middle class. This would be the businessmen who manage and work for companies like Dubai World Ports. We are telling those people, in no uncertain terms, that is doesn’t matter what they do, what matters is what they are. For all our posturing about the hypocrisy of Arab/Muslim Moderates failing to stand up to Middle East fascists, the bottom line is that even when these Arab/Muslim Moderates do what we ask – as has the government and the people of the United Arab Emirates – what we reward those efforts with is little more than distrust and contempt. And that, in the end, will most likely end up costing us more lives.



To: Rande Is who wrote (57306)2/23/2006 2:12:05 PM
From: Rock_nj  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57584
 
Would we have allowed Yugoslavian company to run our ports during the Cold War? Yugoslavia was an independent Communist nation with no close ties to the Soviet Union and no desire to destroy the U.S. Would we let an affiliate by idealogy like Yugoslavian run our ports during the Cold War years? The answer is NO, NEVER.

There are many many many reasons why we should be running our own ports if we are actually serious about the War on Terrorism. Not only internal national security, such as what exactly is getting into this country, but external security too. Our ports are how we interact with the world, and if it is necessary to go to war, why should we rely on others who might have an idealogical affinity with those who we are war at to run our ports.

I guess people can rationalize a reason why the government of the UAE should be allowed to run our ports. But it certainly does not make it appear that we are taking the War on Terrorism seriously to allow something like this to happen.



To: Rande Is who wrote (57306)2/24/2006 9:31:17 AM
From: lavienrose  Respond to of 57584
 
Curiously, isn't Dubai where Bin Ladin went for his health problems before 911 ???????????



To: Rande Is who wrote (57306)3/1/2006 10:50:15 AM
From: paret  Respond to of 57584
 
Dubai's Atlantis to wow the world

JEREMY WATSON Sun 26 Feb 2006

scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com

IT ALREADY has the world's most luxurious guesthouse, the biggest artificial island and the largest indoor ski resort. Now the tiny Arab state of Dubai has come up with another global first: an underwater hotel.

Work will begin later this year on constructing the 500-bedroom development 10 metres down in the warm waters of the Persian Gulf off the Dubai coast.

The watertight rooms, costing from £500 a night up to £3,000 for a suite, are aimed at wealthy travellers who want a unique holiday experience. Guests will disembark at a landing quay before heading below the surface to their watery boudoirs with views out into the open ocean.

Due to open in 2008, the £344m hotel will also have an underwater ballroom, spa and restaurants. If successful, sister establishments will be opened off Monaco, Oman and China with up to 2,000 rooms.

The hotel is being built by Crescent Hydropolis, a company that links Wall Street financier Mansoor Ijaz and the German construction and technology giant Siemens.

They want to exploit Dubai's growing reputation as the Middle East watering hole of the rich and famous. Tourism from Britain alone is booming, with daily direct flights from Glasgow carrying more than 160,000 passengers a year.

Ijaz believes an underwater hotel will expand tourism's frontiers. "Although the concept has been around in principle since 2000, it's only now a real project," he said. "The key about Dubai is turning vision into reality."

With safety a major consideration, Siemens is in charge of the technology. Everything from the kitchens, to fire extinguishers, to the oxygen system will be state of the art. The security system will also be a world leader, with project heads stressing it will be good enough to protect heads of state.

The hotel is another coup for the tiny United Arab Emirates state, the size of Luxembourg, which has a native population of just 150,000 swelled by more than 1.2 million migrant workers, including 110,000 Britons.

To make up for its lack of oil, the ruling Al-Maktoum family has decided that tourism is the route to riches, with Dubai strategically placed halfway between heavily populated Western Europe and the Far East.

Tourism experts believe Dubai has once again stolen a march on its global tourism rivals such as Hong Kong and Las Vegas. "People are always seeking a new sensation and they will want to come back and tell people that they stayed in an underwater hotel," said John Lennon, the professor of travel and tourism at Glasgow Caledonian University's Moffat Centre.

"It's unusual and they might think it is pushing out the box in the same way that bungee jumping was pushing out the box 10 years ago. But aquarium-style projects have been popular around the world and this is just an extension of that. Tourists now seem to want to get closer to the natural world."

Dubai has been very clever in developing iconic tourism projects such as the seven-star Burj-al-Arab hotel and the world islands project, Lennon added. "It has been successful because a lot of people don't realise that it is geographically quite close to a number of danger zones."

The iconic soaring "sail" of the Burj-al-Arab is now a globally recognised symbol of Dubai's naked pursuit of the luxury tourism market in what remains a scrubby strip of desert surrounding a less than inspiring creek.

The construction of what will become the world's tallest building, Burj Dubai - 800 metres high, costing £460m and containing the world's largest shopping mall - has already started.

Dubai-land, an £11bn theme park twice the size of Disneyworld in Florida, is at the planning stage, while an indoor Alpine ski resort which has the technology to make its own snow is already attracting huge crowds.

Dubai's long beach front now has numerous luxury hotels while the really wealthy intend to stay offshore, some on their own manmade islands. An astonishing collection, which will add 75 miles to the Dubai coastline, is under construction from rubble quarried from inland hills and sand vacuumed up from the Gulf floor.

The first, Palm Jumeirah, in the shape of a three-mile-wide palm tree, is accessed by an eight-lane throughway along its trunk. There will be 30 new hotels set along Venice-style canals as well as luxury townhouses. Those who have already bought properties include England captain David Beckham and his teammate Michael Owen.

A second "tree" island, The Palm Jebel Ali, will be completed in 2008, while a third development, an archipelago of 300 artificial islands, is at the planning stage. The world islands project will loosely reflect the map of the world, with outposts shaped like American states such as Florida. Prices will start at $7m.

Andrew Martin, a lecturer in tourism at Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, is another academic who has been watching the Dubai tourism take-over unfold. "They constantly renew the wow factor, and an underwater hotel fits that perfectly," he said. "Dubai has the technology and the money, and at £344m will cost less than the Scottish Parliament."

This article: scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com