To: PROLIFE who wrote (727777 ) 2/24/2006 3:26:07 PM From: DuckTapeSunroof Respond to of 769670 Re: "Dubai evidently was supporting OUR efforts and not the taliban. no, I am not saying they are freedom and Democracy lovers..." Not sure what you base that on... but there is this: ...The unfortunate fact for Bush is that, while he counts the UAE as a loyal friend in the war on terror, two of the 9/11 hijackers came from there. The 9/11 Commission report states that "the vast majority of the money funding the Sept. 11 attacks flowed through the UAE." Port flap serious test for Bush By Linda Feldmann, Staff writer of The Christian Science MonitorFri Feb 24, 3:00 AM ETnews.yahoo.com So, let's see what we do know: un-Democratic regime, a Monarchy. Accused by 9-11 Commission of poor cooperation with US authorities in tracking down funding for terrorism. Waystation for most of the 9-11 attack funding. Heavily influenced by radical Wa'habbist theology, two of the 9-11 attackers called it home. and, as Baldie pointed out, the RULERS of this country have been ALL FRIENDLY with bin Laden in fairly *recent* times... going on 'hunting trips' with him in the desert, etc:siliconinvestor.com Yep, TRUE FRIENDS, indeed! :) Now, as far as your contention that "before and during the war with the taliban, Dubai evidently was supporting OUR efforts and not the taliban." That is only *half* right (maybe not even that). They did not oppose the Tailban BEFORE the US war... they financially SUPPORTED the Taliban at that time, and were one of only a handful of countries on the face of the Earth to OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZE the radical Theocratic government in Afghanistan. Then, there is the nuclear angle... casting some doubts about either their 'security chops', or else their political sympathies:Message 22201572