SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TheBusDriver who wrote (43786)2/24/2006 11:03:58 AM
From: maxncompany  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 313535
 
The one reason people should buy SVM is because their earnings per share will dwarf every other silver out there.



To: TheBusDriver who wrote (43786)2/25/2006 8:06:17 AM
From: robnhood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 313535
 
<<
I think buying BCM and SVM based on the WTC takeover is not a wise move.....BWDIK?>>

Why???

I'm of the opposite opinion. As a matter of fact I doubled up on my BCM because of this and the discussion on here yesterday between CC and someone else.
I fortunately had repurchased my WTC a couple of weeks ago after scaling out up to 18.
My daughter still has 3/4 of her position after I talked her into offing 1/4 at $18.10 a few days ago.
Like all traders I heard that she griped to her Mom about selling out that 1/4 and missing the last gasp. <G>



To: TheBusDriver who wrote (43786)2/25/2006 9:28:33 AM
From: Claude Cormier  Respond to of 313535
 
I agree, one should be buying BCM not because WTC is being taken over, but because BCM has all the ingredeients by itself to eventually be taken over as well.

SVM is another story. One of huge cash flows in China.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News