Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (4506)	2/25/2006 8:24:17 AM
From: haqihana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Peter,People always seem to be interested in getting, or saving, money, so financial benefits for helping the ecosystem to stay healthy, would be effective. Property, in most cases is a person's home, and I believe that a home should still be a man's castle, as long as he takes care of all within his "kingdom" in the right way. For any form of government to have the right to take property away from a person, without compensation, is just like stealing, IMO. I totally agree that abusive pet owners, are the bottom of the barrel. I agree that a pet should be protected from extreme climate. Even though wild animals are able to grow more, and denser, fur to protect them from the cold, those that have been domesticated for all their lives, they will need some help in that department. Good point on the fines. I am very familiar with those small towns that are, in effect, speed traps, and have fallen prey to them myself. My right foot is still a bit leaden.