Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandintoes who wrote (1522)	3/1/2006 1:42:38 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3029

The fascinating result of the Kelo ruling is that it highlights the reality that local elected officials are squared off against the people who elected them. Who do they think they are? Talk about the arrogance of power! This surpasses even the tragic trend of Republicans getting elected to governorships and immediately selling out to their bureaucrats and teachers unions by calling for unexpected tax hikes. When politicians casually forget who hired them, democracy is not working, and tyranny is just around the corner. In that respect, the Kelo decision may just be a blessing in disgust. The result is that a majority of the states already have legislation pending to prevent greedy local politicians from seizing private property and transferring it to other private owners on the prospect that they will generate more tax revenue. The reminder that we really DO have self-determination is a healthy one. If, OTOH, the judicial system interferes with any of these new laws after they pass, it will definitely be time to dramatically limit judicial power-which is ANOTHER right that our people are generally unaware of...

To: sandintoes who wrote (1522)	6/23/2006 9:29:40 PM
From: Glenn Petersen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3029

Bush moves to limit US gov't taking private land By Jeremy Pelofsky Reuters Friday, June 23, 2006; 7:00 PM WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush issued an executive order on Friday to limit the U.S. government from taking private property only for the benefit of other private interests, like corporations. The order came exactly a year after a divided Supreme Court ruled a city could take a person's home or business for a development project to revitalize a depressed local economy, a practice known as eminent domain. "The federal government is going to limit its own use of eminent domain so that it won't be used for purely economic development purposes," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said. She said more than 20 states had already enacted laws that prohibit the use of eminent domain for purely economic development purposes and four states have proposed constitutional amendments on November election ballots. The high court in 2005 backed the taking by the city of New London, Connecticut, of 15 properties belonging to nine residents or investment owners for a project to complement a nearby research facility by drug company Pfizer Inc. The 5-4 high court decision upheld the plan under the U.S. Constitution, which allows the government to take private property through its eminent domain powers in exchange for just compensation. The ruling outraged property rights advocates and conservatives in Congress who said it gave local governments the right to give any home to a wealthy developer as long as there was a commitment to upgrade the property. Bush's order was aimed at limiting the federal government to taking private property, with compensation, for situations in which it was for "the purpose of benefiting the general public and not merely for the purpose of advancing the economic interest of private parties." Bush directed Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to issue instructions to government agencies for implementing the policy and also to monitor takings by the federal government. The order does permit the federal government to take property for many public purposes, such as for a public medical facility, roads, a military reservation, acquiring abandoned property or to prevent a harmful use of land. © 2006 Reuters washingtonpost.com