SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (7109)2/25/2006 1:33:35 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78416
 
I will ask my son in law about th eweather prediciton. He got hi sPHD from UC Irvine and is highly respected in the field. He got an invitation from cambridge to interview for a position there a few months ago.

He knows his stuff. He is just teaching physics to pay the bills and continues his work on global warming.

This NASA head guy (Hanson?-I will ask), who recently mentioned he was being muzzled by Bush and that bush's politicals were editing the scientific reports and would n't stand for, is being slandered by the right wing blogs as a crack pot-he isn't.

MY son in law said he is brillant, and seldom wrong and very brave and outspoken.



To: LLCF who wrote (7109)2/25/2006 3:09:55 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78416
 
The reason you cannot predict it one month out is that at that lead time the weather mass come from far away and the factors of development there get involved with heat cells in the tropic rising to great height and rotating back down thru a far less stable system. Interactions with the upper atmosphere are much harder to track than air movements over-land. Over-sea movements of air masses are hard to factor, which is why hurricane landfalls are so hard to predict with exactness. Once air makes landfall, it one can use one KM cubic cells as a unit, then predictions of movement, addition of moisture, precipitation, speed, rotation, and turbulence can me made very very finely. This is sufficient to et 10 day ahead weather prediction. To get a start on it, which can be refined with statistics, you can use 100,000 farm and city amateur weather centers, plus the national grid of stations. You need wind direction, speed, humidity, dew point, sferics, cloud cover, temperature, barometric pressure, fed back once over 20 minutes. This sort of effort could probably harnessed a lot easier than the 1 million computer tactic needed to assess air-mass progress info.

Another approach is to use present weather data over a surrounding area. One runs stat programs on weather progress and uses modelling programs to run like weather forward with modern input from multiple sources. It is a fact that Buffalo area weather rotates into Northern Ontario within 2 -3 days and using their experience for prediction is better than environment Canada. Similar computer derived refinements could achieve better than standard weather-report predictions for a 5 to 7 day-out period.

EC<:-}