Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stevefoder who wrote (159152)	2/26/2006 10:26:18 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794157

If I am wrong and Hillary is nominated, then she would have a good chance of winning the election since it is hard for the same party to hold onto the White House three terms in a row. There was a defining event in early September, 2001, that changed all that. There may be Republican losses in the House and Senate, but unless the Dems pull a rabbit out of the hat between now and 2008, they are not going to be able to convince the voting public that a Democratic president has the cojones to keep the country safe (my apologies to Hillary for the cojones comment).

To: Stevefoder who wrote (159152)	2/26/2006 11:31:39 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794157

She is too vulnerable to the demands of the far-left which runs the Democratic party. She has been pretending too much to be a moderate and made the far left feel betrayed. My take is still just the opposite - she is less vulnerable than the other candidates, because the far-left knows that at heart, she's one of them. Thus, she's the only one who can get away without pandering to them. TWT