Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (277013)	2/28/2006 12:42:50 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573351

I think they are wanting right of return because they want retribution from Israel for the property confiscated after the 1948 war. All and all, its the best news I've heard from the ME in quite some time. Uhmmm, why? The "right of return" is a deal killer for any 2 state solution. It's consistent with my one state solution, but how can you have a two state Israel and Palestine where the Palestinians can live anywhere they want in Israel? It makes no sense. If its just compensation for property taken during the 1948 war, it shouldn't be called right of return. It should be called lump sum payment request.