Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richnorth who wrote (73893)	2/28/2006 11:10:25 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

The exchange between Dipy and me was about Bush unilaterally deciding to attack Iran and the support he would get if he did so. And I said that if he is a smart guy, he can achieve his goal by letting Israel do it for him instead. Now on the issue of what I think about attacking Iran. Every world citizen has a reason to get worried when nuclear technology falls in the hands of someone who thinks ina very extreme manner. Mr. Ahmedinijad has not shown a sense of maturity and responsibility in his view of the world. Keeping company with Ahmedinijad is Bush with his advocacy of "pre emptive strike." There are many nations, most of them non-nuclear who fear Bush because of his "pre emptive" doctrine and his having nuclear weapons at his command. Similarly, many would fear Mr Ahmedinojad to be in Bush's shoes which he will be if he acquires nuclear weapons capability. So I am against this Iranian regime getting possession of nuclear weapons capability. But should they be attacked? I say no. Diplomacy will work. Russia has met with preliminary success. But the agreement is not enough. We need to monitor the movement of nuclear material in Iran.