Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony@Pacific & TRUTHSEEKER Expose Crims & Scammers!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (427)	2/28/2006 2:29:09 PM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5673

Just saw someone post Elgindys court date on the 6th. I think it was delayed until the 22nd by the Judge.

To: StockDung who wrote (427)	2/28/2006 2:47:14 PM
From: ravenseye	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5673

Seems he wasn't shy about going for $ from the SEC. Here's an interesting exchange about an invoice prepared for the SEC for expenses answering a Subpoena Duces Tecum and a reimbursement check from the SEC. If he hasn't paid that TINY SEC fine yet, it's another belt notch for unpaid bills! Message 12554668 Message 12554869 Message 12555316 still lma(zz)o ... 10 A. He asked me to present to the court that his 11 home was owned by an offshore corporation and, therefore, 12 Mr. Elgindy was the wrong party being sued and on that basis 13 the judgment should be overturned. Message 16970517 I agree the SECs track record is bad after reading the endnotes I posted!