SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (159579)3/1/2006 4:56:43 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Respond to of 793964
 
Foreign Secretary sucks up to Prophet

Jack Straw favours Islam at the expense of the other world religions, says sean thomas


How much "respect" should we give religions? It's a question that is vexing the BBC, where arguments (such as that on Radio 4's Feedback last week) are raging as to whether Mohammad should always be called "the Prophet". The BBC itself appears confused on the issue, with its website sometimes adopting the prefix, and sometimes not.

By contrast, no such confusion seems to afflict the Foreign Secretary. The other day a friend of mine told me that he'd seen Jack Straw, on television, not just using the phrase "Prophet Mohammad", but actually following it with "Peace Be Upon Him".

Astonished by this, I telephoned the Foreign Secretary's press office and inquired. Had Jack Straw ever used the phrase "Peace be Upon Him", after the words "Prophet Mohammad"?
At first, they tried to finesse the issue ("clearly use of such a phrase implies respect for all communities, but these things are a matter of individual choice"), but - after I rang back - they admitted the truth. Yes, the Foreign Secretary really did say, on British television, "the Prophet Mohammad, Peace Be Upon Him".

It's difficult to know whether this is comic, or disturbing, or both. Why should the foreign minister of a secular, mildly Christian country use this peculiar phrase? What's next? Is he going to start crossing himself when discussing church matters? Will he commence any discussions on Israel with the greeting "shalom"? Maybe he will slaughter a chicken before conferring with the new prime minister of Haiti.

Of course, we know he isn't going to do any of these things, because he doesn't feel the need to grovel to the Christian community, or appease the Jewish lobby. Yet for some reason he does feel the need to make this asinine and embarrassing gesture towards Britain's 1.6 million Muslims. Bless him.

thefirstpost.co.uk

source: thepoolbar.blogspot.com



To: John Carragher who wrote (159579)3/1/2006 5:23:54 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 793964
 
Got to go awol for a while. Adios.
edit...oops, sorry Lindy, i thought I'd clicked Private Reply. oh well.
Mqurice



To: John Carragher who wrote (159579)3/1/2006 5:26:51 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793964
 
I sort of knew that but had one more rant left for the day. I am going to take a nap, now that i realize i am talking to a bunch of old codgers. (g)