Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (73976)	3/2/2006 1:30:33 AM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

They said they have no proof of any collaborative relations with Al Qaeda...and no connection to 9-11. I guess that would be no proof. I've never heard of the judge you're talking about. If he declared that Saddam was involved...then he must have the proof. Where is the proof? What is the proof? Christ, Dick Cheney said Saddam was reconstituting nuclear weapons and we are certain that Saddam has WMD, and Bush said we found WMD. So far it's all been hooey. The best indication to me that Saddam was figured to be no threat is Rumsfeld saying that he wanted an invasion force of 40,000 troops. I also remember things like cake walk, flowers, music and the oil would pay for it all. In fact I've heard so much BS coming from these guys that I no longer believe a single word they say. Orca