SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (277756)3/2/2006 1:18:18 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574955
 
>would not taking away $3B from Egypt as well would give you $6B or you really need only 3

I'd consider that, too... or at least making sure that the 3 billion that goes to Egypt goes to help the people who need it, not the people in power. AFAIK, Egypt is a much poorer country than Israel, and though Israel has its poverty issues lately, our money's going to them for defense.

-Z



To: AK2004 who wrote (277756)3/3/2006 7:02:15 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574955
 
re: We've helped Israel enough;

would not taking away $3B from Egypt as well would give you $6B or you really need only 3

Israel gets more than $3 billion.....more like $6 billion. Z was talking about direct aid. There is indirect aid that is provided to Israel......like military equipment.

Meanwhile, Egypt has nearly 80 million people while Israel has 6 million. How fair is that?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News