SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MrLucky who wrote (13694)3/2/2006 10:21:14 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541735
 
Nothing to say on the subject of your misstated claim about what I said?

Message 22216234

I must say, I'm disappointed.



To: MrLucky who wrote (13694)3/2/2006 2:32:00 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541735
 
While Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was ripping President Bush's handling of American ports management, Bill Clinton was pushing for one of his favorite White House aides to be hired to defend the deal.

Not clear that Novak actually has the goods this time. This is usually the kind of thing he is very good at and well worth reading for. He has sources no one else has and tends to report them accurately.

But this time, he didn't nail it down. Perhaps it happened; perhaps it didn't. But the evidence is shaky, at best.

However, it is clear from Novak and others that the Clinton folk, meaning people who were active in his administration, are very active on the side of the Dubai company. I don't find that surprising.



To: MrLucky who wrote (13694)3/2/2006 10:24:06 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Respond to of 541735
 
Two different people in the Clinton household similar to the Carville/Matlin household.

Did you expect Hillary to stand by her man on the Dubai port issue? Why is that.