Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (159665)	3/2/2006 3:11:14 PM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 794011

don't quite get your point If she were to change her mind now, it would look as if a well-paid Bill influenced her thinking in behalf of the proposed port operator. This would damage her newly found hard-on-national-security persona. But BC gave sound advice, asked for and got a 45 day time frame in which to "investigate" things, i.e., enough time for the furor to blow over. After a few concessions, the deal goes through. The Clintons get their family petrobucks, she is still perceived as tough on national security, and the Arabs get the ports. Slick, huh? It isn't going to work, however, because the GOP is going to be relentless on it, especially her potential opponents in 2008.