Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (21047)	3/2/2006 7:04:27 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 21057

1 - The Supreme Court should overturn it because the original decision was not solidly grounded in the constitution. Stare decisis and maybe other concerns might argue against overturn, but the original decisions (and the decisions it was based on) are fundamentally flawed IMO. 2 - They will uphold it. They might allow more restriction than they would have in the past but they are not going to overrule Roe vs. Wade, and allowing this law will strike down Roe vs. Wade, most likely if they did allow this law to stand they would explicitly strike down Roe vs. Wade, but even if it was not an official part of the decision effectively Roe vs. Wade would be dead. Tim