Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : YEEHAW CANDIDATES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Galirayo who wrote (15953)	3/3/2006 12:03:12 AM
From: PuddleGlum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23958

Ray, Re: "paying the price" I was just enjoying the fun. You have never seemed particularly critical of people, so I don't have you pegged as one to watch out for. But I do have you pegged as a person with a sense of humor. Where have I been? Reading up on Pattern Recognition, genotyping, proper display of statistical data (Edward Tufte stuff), writing poetry, writing essays on religion, writing a little satire. You know, the usual stuff. Drawing me into conversation? I removed my subject mark for this thread only a couple of days or so ago, so you get an A+ for a job well done. The Entire Flaw in PnF is there is No Time Function I used to think that it was a flaw, too. But it's event-based, where the events are based on price movement. Daily MA's are also event-based, but the event is the passing of 24 hours. Those 24-hours having zilch zero nada to do with the price, so the price-based event that PnF uses is superior here (only slightly, as MA's have a pretty good correlation with PnF support and resistance lines). Dorsey Wright PnF site deals a little with momentum, but I prefer the more conventional uses of momentum. I hear you about the volume, though. When I get my artificial neural networks in better shape I'll certainly incorporate volume, because I'm certain that it is significant.