SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (182866)3/4/2006 9:07:23 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
We should pressure Israel to open themselves to IAEA inspections.

Pressure them all you want. They can legally tell everyone to "p*ss up a rope" since they are not a signator of the NPT.

NPT Article III: The IAEA administers international safeguards to verify that non-nuclear weapon States party to the NPT fulfill the non-proliferation commitment they have made, "with a view to preventing diversion of nuclear energy from peaceful uses to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices."

iaea.org

So your first step Chris, is to pressure Israel to become a signator to the NPT.

That's the legal process that must be followed before you can use the IAEA as an enforcement tool to enforce their compliance.

Now think about it another way.. There are any number of treaties, including Kyoto, (clinton signed Kyoto in 1998, but we are not bound to it due to non-ratification in the congress) that the US has not signed, and are directly deleterious to our economic well-being, or national security interests.

So what you're telling us is that the rest of the world could send some enforcement agency to make us comply with a treaty we have not signed onto.

And that's a direct violation of sovereignty.

So think about the precedent (and can of worms) you'd be opening if you granted the IAEA that ability to force Israel to comply with a treaty they didn't sign onto.

Hawk