Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pied Piper who wrote (57356)	3/5/2006 3:08:05 AM
From: shadowman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57584

I agree. Apparently paret was too young and not contemporaneously aware of what happened prior to the Shah fleeing Iran (before his countrymen had a chance to string him up). Blaming Carter for what happened to the Shah is akin to blaming Reagan for Marcos' departure from the Philippines. "Blaming" in this context, if it were true, would be unnecessarily pejorative since both deposed leaders were not exactly saints, and the citizens of both countries felt that their time had run out (despite what the US wished). Some might call that democratic.<gg>