Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lhn5 who wrote (45027)	3/6/2006 7:56:46 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 313485

Some people seems to disagree with you. First they get that Nevada property, next that Bolivian property with good drill results, and now a lock-in financing with a precious-metal fund. Someone like what they got. I am not pushing as I took a loss in NW after La Juliana and I have not purchased back, but this Bolivian property looks serious to me. Less so, the Neveda property, but it is is in a hot area. - there is definitely something crokked about this NW stuff. You may be right. Let's ask the guys buying in this financing when their name is announced.

To: Lhn5 who wrote (45027)	3/6/2006 8:07:10 PM
From: Canuck Dave	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 313485

Hmmm... I don't like it when people make unsubstantiated claims of criminal behavior. If you.ve got the goods on these guys, please provide us with links to the evidence. Otherwise, just indicate you don't like the share trading behavior. If you think it's to be avoided, fair enough. I follow SUR and will occasionally take positions, but I sure wouldn't recommend it to anyone. It looks manipulated to me, but have no hard evidence of wrongdoing, so make no claims against it. And I've consistently made money on it. Might be coming into range again. CD