Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (278790)	3/7/2006 12:13:07 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 1572536

Tenchusatsu, no person has ever referred to a mother as a non-human with no rights to live. The hard-reality is you have to pick between one or the other. You pick the fetus, while I'll pick the mother. If you kill a mother, what do you tell her other children, husband, and parents? I think a mother has a higher priority - she's got her elder parents to think of and her immediate family. I feel as if you ignored my points in my post, even though I took the time to present some information and some interesting POV. I think you could go back to my post and address each point as well as the perspective, rather than ignore all of them. I have a question for you: is it more ethical to let a fetus live until the 3rd trimester only to watch it get killed by delivery, or is it more ethical to let the fetus die earlier when you know 100% for a fact the fetus will die in/by the delivery? I know of an anti-abortion female that is so against abortion, she is intentionally carrying a fetus into the 3rd trimester that has zero chance of living once it is delivered, even though she was told by her doctor a long time ago that her fetus has ZERO chance of living during the delivery because it has a well-known chromosomal defect that means it will die at birth aka stillborn. To intentionally bring a non-viable fetus to the late stage of 40 weeks simply so she can deliver it to a painful death. And you would call that religious? RE: "Whatever happened to "finding common ground" anyway?" Well, then don't ignore my points. You can't get anywhere if you ignore the other person's points.