SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (183115)3/7/2006 9:23:03 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
This is you, Soldier of Fortune mercenary Hawkie:

redrat.net

..."According to figures current during the active war a year ago, the salary of a soldier in the lowest rank who has one year's service was $15,480 a year - only a thousand dollars more than the average pay for an usher in a movie theatre in the USA. The pay for an experienced corporal of three years of service was $19,980 a year.

For this, US soldiers are on the frontlines in Iraq, risking their lives; with over 700 dead, and many more returning home amputees and permanently impaired, they have much at risk, yet their nation recompenses them with minimal pay.

Meanwhile, the government pays private firms between $500 and $1,500 a day for the experienced military personnel they supply in Iraq. That works out to mercenaries who often earn between $150,000 and $250,000 a year.

In stark terms, a mercenary works in a less risky position, providing support to fighting men or guarding oil wells instead of going on patrols in hostile territory under enemy fire and assault - and makes 10 or 20 times as much money as a soldier who serves his country instead of a corporation."...

It's what you're fighting for - corporations. It's why the chimp Caesar invaded Iraq. Rummy and Cheney knew from long experince that war is a VERY profitable business, from being involved, both in and out of government. You're just a tiny, tiny pawn in the game. You might feel highly compensated, but it's chump change to the true profiteers.

brook.edu

It was Bush and Rummy that didn't put enough REAL troops in there, requiring scum like you to become involved. So, don't blame it on ME!



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (183115)3/7/2006 9:31:00 AM
From: bentway  Respond to of 281500
 
"That's the decision of the Congress, not the SecDef."

The chimp Caesar and Rummy are the ones that request FROM the congress the military they want. You KNOW that, don't you dummy? After 9/11, Bush could have easily told congress he needed 200,000 more boots on the ground soldiers to fight the GWOT ( of course, he clueless, so Rummy would have had to have requested them ), and congress would have signed off on it. You KNOW that too.