SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: eracer who wrote (188933)3/7/2006 8:12:19 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
re: <<zx: Now why would the intel FX-60 being 200MHz higher clocked take 120% longer to complete?>>

<eracer: Quite simply because... there is roughly a 0% chance that Intel happened to use the exact same 304MB wav file>

...Or because Intel had SMP turned off for both systems so that Intel's choking FSB wouldn't be too distracting.

Petz



To: eracer who wrote (188933)3/7/2006 8:21:41 PM
From: AK2004Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
re: Quite simply because it wasn't an apples-to-apples comparison

ok, there was some statements about intel's gain over current intel architecture so let compare apples-to-apples

conroe is about 50% faster than fx-60 (without overclocking)

32/1.5/73=.29 or about 3+ times faster than current architecture

wow, what a "leap ahead", LOL


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News