Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (730065)	3/8/2006 11:09:35 AM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

No you're assuming that which you cannot know. We don't know who or under what circumstances the person donated blood. The person may not have known, and probably didn't know they were infected. Remember there was never a case of AIDS before the early 80's, and blood was not screened for the HIV virus. For all we know the person simply wanted to do their duty and donate blood. I donate blood twice a year or more. If your point was, that knowing what we now know about AIDs/HIV, that one should not entertain the idea of multiple sex partners, or share needles, then I would agree with that. You tend to make your point in a very clumsy way though. Orca