To: waitless who wrote (96 ) 3/8/2006 7:10:35 PM From: creede Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 354 Hey, my preacher told the same thing in church a few weeks ago, is he pumper too? For God perhaps. Besides, it's the principle that matters. Great DD to find a counter opinion, but what makes snopes the all knowing authority? They could be wrong. But you know what, this is very ironic the issue you take over sending out inspirational messages. I wonder why you never seem to point that high powered DD in the direction of inspiration. I mean come on. The company you are attacking, NNYG, is 100% transparent and 100% reporting (including share revenues). Jon Ginder is a prayer group leader, and had some very powerful information for me today on the topic of dilution. We discussed what his opinions are in the way of what it would take, in his opinion, for a current TF to be banished from the list (since it's bound to happen eventually, since the greed factor over the increased market caps is bound to entice someone). His response might shock you. He said that by law any company that sells shares must have a vote of the board, and an opinion letter. He said that the best way to keep the CEO's in check is to call them if we discover that shares have been sold, and ask why the shares were sold (and perhaps a copy of the opinion letter). Also, he said that any revenues generated should be accounted for on the report. He also went on to say that any CEO that will not fully disclose this info (BTW - he said that the opinion letter is public info....AND the TA has the opinion letter as well!) would obviously not be considered transparent. From a CEO none the less! So, as it appears, on the topic of dilution, it's a case by case basis, and full disclosure is expected for the TF staff to determine if the shares have been sold for a true purpose to enhance the operations of the company. If any company refuses discloser, then they will be put to a vote! Sweet! GodBless-ND cris