Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (189098)	3/8/2006 5:42:53 PM
From: g_w_north	Respond to of 275872

<re: FX-60 with better video card and lower resolution: 90.4 FPS THG 3.6GHz P4 with worse video card and higher resolution: 136.7 FPS cool that would be about the right ratio as measured between conroe and fx-60. I guessed you just proved that conroe is no better than p4, right? I have to disagree with you - conroe maybe a little better than p4 :-))> Priceless...

To: AK2004 who wrote (189098)	3/8/2006 5:42:54 PM
From: eracer	Respond to of 275872

Re: cool that would be about the right ratio as measured between conroe and fx-60. I guessed you just proved that conroe is no better than p4, right? I have to disagree with you - conroe maybe a little better than p4 Great observation. There is no disagreeing with apples-to-oranges benchmark comparisons. Tom's clearly shows that Conroe will not outperform P4 in gaming. Conroe is a waste of silicon like P4. Case closed. :)