Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (103566)	3/10/2006 6:14:03 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

From the SI post I linked to - "There remained others either dimmer or more invested in their partisanship that continued to claim that Bush ignored a warning of a breach. And there were some on the other side who, recognizing the acknowledgement of the overreach, tried to turn a reverse-gotcha into a broader rehabilitation of Bush. Shame on both of them, IMO." I often will defend someone against a specific false charge, and people think that means I am giving the person defended my unqualified support but I normally am not doing so, and I am not doing so in Bush's case.