SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Shack who wrote (130567)3/10/2006 7:47:03 PM
From: chainik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
<<<we have risk-averse folks selling into a rising market, to me that would be unequivocally bullish>>>

Eventually yes, but what if the selling continues for 2-3 more months before a good bottom is reached? It's a question of timing. And this good bottom may be well below comp 2200.

The charts you are looking at are pointing up. You suggest that the trend will reverse only when optimistic extremes are reached.

The chart of SMH below 37 looks bad. Using your logic, one can speculate that the selling may continue until extremes in pessimism are reached. Not even close right now.

Not that I disagree with you (everything you say makes perfect sense), but I see very mixed market with weak former leaders. In many respects, the situation here is similar to February-March of 2005. A lot of neutral/mixed readings. Can go either way.




To: Shack who wrote (130567)3/16/2006 9:05:48 AM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 209892
 
Jason G did reply to my note - a few days ago. He didn't offer any particular disagreements with your remarks... stating that it is a matter of interpretation and of different time frames. But, apparently, his research does show that such periods of falling optimism tend to precede declines.

Indeed, imo, there is always this balance at play - between a "healthy" wall of worry, and a real weakening in "animal spirits".

Btw, check these comments from VVV about the stock/bond ratio - as well as my reply. Curious stuff.

Message 22264810