To: Crabbe who wrote (4809 ) 3/10/2006 11:58:52 PM From: TobagoJack Respond to of 217691 Hello crabbe, Try … n.ireland and england singapore and malaysia zimbabwe and everybody nigeria and everybody else n.korea and s.korea or take a spin in your car to the wrong part of your town else, the corollary to your theory would have it that at some point Miami will not be aligned with Hartfort, and S.California will go with Mexico … by golly, perhaps you are correct! You must also believe that Canada is more aligned with the US than with … oh, say Germany, and … why Aussie parliamentarians gave Hu a standing ovation and Bush a raspberry cheer. Perhaps you figure the parliamentarians do not represent the people, in which case Australia is not a democracy? So, you believe India is aligned with the US now (oops, perhaps I am mistaken, since India is not English speaking per your take, per definition of 'official'), do you, and by extension, for most of modern history as well. Is that why India is not backing the English speaking US against the Persian speaking Iran? Most illuminating, into what passes for your thinking process, in a unique sort of way, akin but not entirely the same as the simplistic read on how folks speaking different languages can get together, say for example, Persian and Arabic speakers who believe in the same book. You must be one of those that would pull a Clinton and define sex in a unique way, and push a Bush, and figure torture in a singular fashion. It must be liberating to have such a pristine thought processor. With electorates such as yourself, the world can rest easy. That’s all for today’s lesson; no charge, since you provided the entertainment for free as well. Chugs, J