Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLNI - Game Over -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yardslave who wrote (3081)	3/10/2006 9:28:41 PM
From: rrm_bcnu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12518

The first time I was asked to comment on a possible increase in the O/S from 2.3B to 3.7B was on SI, on January 10 2006, in the post below. I did not respond to that post. To: rrm_bcnu who wrote (1731) 1/10/2006 2:20:30 PM From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell Read Replies (3) of 2493 Rick, if the o/s was increased from 2.5B to 3.7B -- a whopping 50% -- in just one month, what would that imply to you? Yes, of course you may call PLNI to get the "real" o/s before you reply. Ask for Judy. - Jeff Message 22046721 Later I saw this post from Jeff Mitchell to Captn J T Kirk indicating that Jeff Mitchell had obtained the information around 12/25/2005. That means he withheld that information from public posting until 1/10/2006.... WHY? To: Captain James T. Kirk who wrote (2259) 1/31/2006 3:23:28 PM From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell Read Replies (2) of 2493 I assume PLNI promised pinksheets.com the updated numbers "ASAP" in order to get the quotes turned back on. I'm interested to see how long it takes for them to show up (my guess is after the market closes) and how much higher the o/s is above the already staggering number I was told back around Christmas. - Jeff Message 22118281 Later, an attempt to cover tracks??? Is Jeff blowing smoke to attempt to hide the date that they actually learned the news about the new share balance? To: scionist who wrote (2282) 2/3/2006 1:32:35 AM From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell Read Replies (2) of 2493 You and I and Worm all knew back in early January the o/s has increased from 2.3B to 3.7B. We urged people to call the company because, well, we're just Basholes so we just make stuff up, right? Yes, I do give credit to those that did call. I hope they are now asking themselves the very real questions "Was I lied to?" and "Was I played?". I mean, if "we" knew the numbers, can anyone say with a straight face "they" didn't know them? - Jeff Message 22128558 Later, a second attemp to cover tracks??? To: shortsinthesand who wrote (2516) 2/8/2006 10:45:10 AM From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell Read Replies (2) of 2563 Given that the 3.7B figure was current as of early January, if any new share count is revealed, given the steady increase in the o/s over the past six months, sheer logic dictates that if the numbers have indeed changed it will be an additional increase. I'm really amazed how people are acting so surprised. After all, the company increased the authorized to 5B. For what possible reason would a company do this if they truly planned to decrease the o/s? Hello. Wake up, people. - Jeff Message 22144858 I am very interested in the reason for the possible cover-up. Were there trades that took place that were incriminating? Apparently I'm not the only person interested.