SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (18591)3/10/2006 11:41:50 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
CLAUDE ALLEN

John Podhoretz
The Corner

I wrote a book about the Bush White House. I know the names of many people who worked in the Bush White House. I've read every story there is to read about the Bush White House. I've been a political journalist for almost a quarter century, worked in a Republican administration, and gone to many right-wing parties. So let me say this about accused thief and former White House policy bigshot Claude Allen:

WHO?

corner.nationalreview.com



To: Sully- who wrote (18591)3/12/2006 11:58:49 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
MORE CLAUDE ALLEN

Byron York
The Corner

I just talked to White House spokesman Scott McClellan about the Claude Allen matter. He added several details to the story.

The chronology begins on January 2, when Allen was stopped by security at a Target store in suburban Maryland. "On January 2, when the incident occurred at the Target store, Claude called Andy [White House chief of staff Andrew Card] that night and reported the incident to him," McClellan said. "The next morning, Andy directed him to talk to Harriet [White House counsel Harriet Miers]. He explained to both of them that it was a misunderstanding, that he was returning some merchandise and there as some confusion with his credit cards because he had moved so many times....He assured Andy and Harriet that he had done nothing wrong."

McClellan said Card and Miers both gave Allen the benefit of the doubt in the matter, in part because Allen, who had filled a number of high-ranking positions and had been nominated to a seat on the U.S. circuit courts of appeals, had repeatedly been through the scrutiny that such jobs involve. "He had gone through background investigations several times," McClellan said. "I don't think they thought it was fathomable that he would jeopardize so much."

But apparently he had. And the next hint that something was wrong came just a few days later, when Allen again spoke to Card and Miers and said he was thinking about quitting. "Within a few days of talking to Harriet, he came back and said that he had been thinking about it for some time," McClellan said. "And because of the strain on his family, and to spend more time with his family...he had been putting in long hours, and he thought it was best that he resign."

Allen decided to leave after the State of the Union Address, which was January 31. His last day was February 17. McClellan said Allen gave a two-week notice in early February, and that was when Card told President Bush that Allen was leaving. It was in that discussion, McClellan said, that Card told the president about the incident at Target. "Andy informed the president in early February and said that Claude had given his notice," McClellan said. "Andy told the president about the incident during that meeting."

The fact that Card told the president in early February suggests that Card thought there might be some connection between the Target incident and Allen's sudden decision to leave. According to McClellan, nothing else happened before Allen's departure on February 17. McClellan said that when he talked to reporters on February 9 about Allen -- assuring them that Allen was leaving because he wanted to spend more time with his family -- he, McClellan, did not know about the incident at Target. McClellan said he learned about Allen's trouble with the law on Friday when he was called by a reporter.

One more thing. In a Corner entry below, I wrote that "We know now that Montgomery County Police contacted the White House in January with some sort of inquiry about Allen." I based that on a report in the Washington Post which, citing Lt. Eric Burnett, a spokesman for the Montgomery County Police Department, said, "Burnett said Montgomery police contacted the White House to verify Allen's identity after the Jan. 2 incident. He said that was the extent of their communication with the administration."

McClellan said he wasn't aware of any contact from the Montgomery County Police, although it's possible that it did happen. "They may well have contacted us to verify his employment," McClellan said, "but I'm not aware of any contact they had with us about any investigation." In any event, he said, White House officials first learned about Allen's problems from Allen himself.

corner.nationalreview.com



To: Sully- who wrote (18591)3/14/2006 3:24:59 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
The Angry Left can't even get Schadenfreude right.

BY JAMES TARANTO
Best of the Web Today
Monday, March 13, 2006 2:56 p.m. EST

The Sad Case of Claude Allen

The police department of Montgomery County, Md., on Friday announced the arrest of a Gaithersburg man "for a continuing retail store theft scheme":

<<< Claude Alexander Allen, age 45, . . . was charged with theft scheme over $500 and theft over $500. . . . On January 2, 2006, a Target store Loss Prevention Manger [sic] observed an unknown man enter the store located at 25 Grand Corner Avenue in Gaithersburg. He was observed in the store with an empty Target bag in a shopping cart. The man was then seen selecting merchandise throughout the store and placing items in the Target bag. He put additional items in his cart. The man then went to guest services where he produced a receipt and received a refund for the items he had just selected from the store shelves. After receiving the refund he left the store without paying for the additional merchandise in the shopping cart. He was apprehended by the store employee. >>>

Police allege that "Allen had been receiving refunds in an amount exceeding $5,000 during last year":

<<< He would buy items, take them out to his car, and return to the store with the receipt. He would select the same items he had just purchased, and then return them for a refund. . . . Throughout 2005 he obtained refunds for items ranging from clothing, a Bose theater system, stereo equipment, and [a] photo printer to items valued only at $2.50. >>>

What makes this interesting is who Claude Allen is. Last month, as the New York Times reports, he resigned as the White House's top domestic policy adviser, ostensibly to spend more time with his family. Earlier President Bush had nominated him for a seat on the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, but he withdrew his name after Democrats filibustered the nomination.

Assuming that the charges are true, this is one of those crimes that just make you scratch your head. Why would someone in a prominent position, who earned (according to the Times) $161,000 a year, risk it all to steal the equivalent of just over a week and a half's pay? Allen's alleged crime is neither petty enough to be excused nor big enough to be explained. It's just pitiful.

Allen is said to be something of a moralist, and left-wing bloggers are, predictably enough, exultant. Typical is this comment from Daily Kos diarist "DarkSyde":


<<< Allen was a big abstinence only crusader and led several assaults on AIDS service organizations as well. This paragon of moral values was recruited by Karl Rove. >>>

It's a familiar theme: Left-wing antimoralists attack right-wing moralists when the latter are found engaging in some crime or sin or vice. But a moralist's own propensity for immoral behavior does not discredit his moralism. After all, the temptation to do wrong is a universal human trait. Perhaps those in whom that temptation is strongest also have a more acute awareness of the need for social restraints to prevent bad acts.

Still, as John Podhoretz notes, the left-wing glee at Allen's apparently self-inflicted plight is understandable:

<<< Lot of leftist Schadenfreude at the arrest of top White House aide Claude Allen, and who could blame them? If the situation were reversed--if, say, a John Conyers staffer had been appointed to a federal judgeship by Bill Clinton, was blocked by Republicans, was then given a job with a fancy title at the Clinton White House and then abruptly resigned because, it turned out, he had shoplifted--the glee on the Right would have been irrepressible.

Having said that, I'm getting genuinely insane e-mail following a few Atrios postings about my "Who the heck is Claude Allen" posts in the past few days--e-mails accusing me of "lying" to "cover up" for the White House and then cursing me out in the language of eleven year-olds. This suggests to me that the next few weeks are going to feature some wild theorizing according to which Karl Rove and the President assigned Claude Allen to steal from Target. The Bush haters can't even allow themselves to enjoy their Schadenfreude. >>>

Schadenfreude, it would seem, can be a sign of psychological health. Now there's an interesting insight.

opinionjournal.com

montgomerycountymd.gov

sfgate.com

dailykos.com

corner.nationalreview.com



To: Sully- who wrote (18591)3/15/2006 12:54:13 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
AN EVIL TWIN

John Podhoretz
The Corner

Maybe I'm overreading, but it seems to me this front-page New York Times story on Claude Allen, the top White House aide arrested for shoplifting, is hinting that Allen's identical twin, Floyd, may actually be the one responsible.

corner.nationalreview.com

nytimes.com



To: Sully- who wrote (18591)3/15/2006 4:14:03 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
TWIN BROTHER, PART II

By Michelle Malkin
March 14, 2006

Josh Marshall has published a high school yearbook photo of Claude Allen, and his twin brother, Floyd.

michellemalkin.com

The oh-so-compassionate Left is snickering at the possibility that Floyd Allen may have been responsible for the crimes with which Claude Allen has now been charged.

See here, here, here, here, and here.
wonkette.com
sadlyno.com
plaidder.livejournal.com
jake-wallace.livejournal.com
el-pinko-grande.livejournal.com

I don't see why this is funny. If it turns out that Claude Allen, a father of three who reportedly has bailed out his troubled twin brother before, tried to protect Floyd Allen and ruined his career out of familial love, that is an extraordinary thing.

Tell me again why this is funny.

***

Here's an NPR interview with Michele Norris and Washington Post reporter Michael Fletcher, which contains the following exchange:

<<< Norris: We should note something, Michael. Apparently Claude Allen has a twin brother?

Fletcher: Yes, he does. He has an identical twin brother who even close friends can’t tell them apart when they see them. And people have seen him and close friends say that Mr. Allen has indicated to them that maybe his brother holds the key to this entire puzzling affair. >>>

michellemalkin.com

nytimes.com

npr.org



To: Sully- who wrote (18591)3/16/2006 1:13:05 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35834
 
    I'm sorry it took a tough period in Allen's life for the 
New York Times to feature him under a banner headline on
its front page, but all in all, I'm glad to finally know
about Claude Allen. I'm proud to have this great fellow
sinner in our party.

Welcome to My World, Claude Allen

by Ann Coulter
HUMAN EVENTS
Posted Mar 15, 2006

I guess the only way we'll ever find out how many blacks have worked in the Bush administration is to wait for them to get in trouble someday so we can read the breathless, triumphant stories on the front page of the New York Times about a black Republican scofflaw. It's amazing that anyone has ever heard of Condoleezza Rice -- she's never even been arrested for jaywalking.

Claude Allen, whom I first heard of this week, was a top adviser to President Bush for more than 4 1/2 years. Soon after Bush was elected in 2000, he made Allen the No. 2 official at the Department of Health and Human Services. Allen later became Bush's domestic policy adviser, meeting with the president several times a week.

In 2003, Bush nominated Allen to a federal judgeship on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals -- which nomination was then blocked by the party that wouldn't exist without black votes. Deploying their usual strategy against black Republicans, Democrats raised questions about Allen's "legal credentials": Democrat-ese for "He's black, so he's probably not very smart." Allen went to Duke Law School, where he was remembered fondly by law professor Walter Dellinger, later Clinton's solicitor general.

During the entire time this talented, intelligent, magnificently conservative black man held high positions in the Bush administration, he was mentioned in only 11 articles in The New York Times.
(A small part of Times Executive Editor Bill Keller dies every time the paper is forced to mention any black top officials in the Bush administration. It might remind people that the most highly placed black in the Clinton administration was his secretary, Betty Currie.)

But since Allen was accused of stealing from department stores a few weeks ago, the Times has mentioned him in seven articles -- including a major front page article on Monday, coverage more appropriate to the first moon landing. This makes Allen the first black alleged thief whose photo has ever appeared in the New York Times.

Allen isn't even working for the Bush administration anymore. Yet the Times is wallowing in his agony. I've never seen people enjoy another person's private pain so much -- at least not since a prosecutor started investigating Rush Limbaugh for taking too many back pain pills.

Let me be the first to say: Congratulations, Mr. Allen! The New York Times really hates you. Welcome to my world. We're so happy to have you in our club.

I'm not shocked by the information that Claude Allen is not without original sin. But it has to be said: He was pretty close.

Allen emerged from a tough neighborhood in Washington, D.C., to go to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and then Duke Law School. He joined a "mostly white and liberal" fraternity, according to the Times, where he was adored -- despite the fact that he didn't drink, a major demerit at a fraternity -- for his ability to get along with anyone. One fraternity brother told the Times that Allen was "always thoughtful and respectful of different opinions" -- a trait that would come in handy for a black teetotaler living in a UNC frat house.

He became a born-again Christian at college and -- the obvious next step -- a Republican after college. These acts are known in the liberal rulebook as "strike two" and "strike three," respectively. He explained leaving the party of his birth to become a Republican with eloquence:
    "I realized after the fact that I agree more with the 
Republican Party platform, that it talked about
independence, that it talked about individual
responsibility, individual rights, it talked about the
ability to guarantee opportunities, not outcomes,"
adding, "that was very much what my family stood for."
He is married with four children, all of whom he home-schools. (Is there such a thing as strike four?) So he was already the moral equivalent to a Ku Klux Klanner in liberal eyes. Wait, no, if he were a former Klanner, he'd be the Democratic senator from West Virginia. Let me rephrase that: He was already a meat-eating, God-fearing, patriotic American in liberal eyes.

Allen also worked for the sainted Jesse Helms, former senator from North Carolina. By now, the average liberal would need yoga and a Barbra Streisand album to calm down. After Helms' 1984 Democratic opponent, James B. Hunt Jr., ran a TV commercial saying Helms was backed by "right-wing nuts," Allen reacted by saying that if the Helms campaign was run by similar guttersnipes, they could say Hunt was backed by "queers."

This week at the New York Times, it was revenge of the queers. I'm sorry it took a tough period in Allen's life for the New York Times to feature him under a banner headline on its front page, but all in all, I'm glad to finally know about Claude Allen. I'm proud to have this great fellow sinner in our party.

humaneventsonline.com



To: Sully- who wrote (18591)3/30/2006 8:30:10 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
It's hard out there for a black conservative

by Larry Elder
Townhall.com
Mar 30, 2006

"I could never vote for a Republican. It would be like voting for the Klan."

A prominent, incredibly successful black businessman told me that a few years ago. This attitude perhaps explains the unbridled joy with which some black pundits greeted "the fall" of Claude Allen, President George W. Bush's top domestic policy adviser from January 2005 until his abrupt resignation on Feb. 9, 2006. Now we know why.

On March 9, 2006, Montgomery County police arrested Allen on charges of felony theft and felony theft scheme. Authorities say he entered stores like Target, purchased merchandise and took the items out to his car. He then re-entered the store, receipt in hand, and picked up the same item from a shelf to "return" it for a refund. Allegedly, over the past year, Allen used the scheme to steal more than $5,000 worth of merchandise. Talk about a crash. Allen goes from a $161,000-a-year job with serious presidential face time, to a disgraced defendant facing up to 15 years in prison. Some pundits could scarcely withhold their glee. Not just because a former Bush aide finds himself in the news for the wrong reasons, but because Allen is a conservative black who's fallen from grace.

So what, you ask? Good question.

A black columnist wrote an opinion piece for the Los Angeles Times called, "Claude Allen's Life Sentence," subtitled, "Did the pressures of being a black conservative take a toll on the former Bush aide?"

Erin Aubry Kaplan writes,

<<< "I don't support conservatism in its current iteration, and I support black conservatives even less . . . " >>>

She then provides this helpful psychoanalysis of Allen,

<<< "Here is a man who, like most black conservatives, has had to do an awful lot of personal and political rationalizing to pay dues. . . . It's hard to imagine that such compromises and cognitive dissonance don't exact a psychological toll at some point, and Allen's alleged dabbling in crime might have been that point for him. . . . After a career of always conducting himself appropriately, as his mentor Clarence Thomas reportedly advised, did he finally crack under the pressure?" >>>

The Wave newspaper serves the predominately minority community of South Central Los Angeles. In an editorial, the Wave writes,

<<< "Wrongly and sadly, Allen's life took a bad turn from the moment he signed up as one of a disgraceful generation of African-American conservatives [emphasis added], led by his mentor Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who have been all too eager to put black faces on retrograde ideologies on issues of racial justice, economics and civil rights in exchange for a proximity to Republican power. . . . Given all of this, perhaps being known to the ages as a petty criminal is preferable to how Allen would have likely been regarded by history had his career in politics not come to such an anticlimactic and ignominious -- but nonetheless welcome -- conclusion." >>>


Apparently saying cruel, mean-spirited, hideous things about black Republicans has no consequences -- especially if the critic is black.

Black illustrator Aaron McGruder of "The Boondocks," for example, gave a speech at Emory University in which he said -- one presumes facetiously -- about Condoleezza Rice, "She can kill me and my whole family." On television's "America's Black Forum," McGruder elaborated,


<<< "I don't like Condoleezza Rice because of her politics. I don't like Condoleezza Rice because she's part of this oil cabal that's now in the White House. I don't like her cause she's a murderer. You know, I'm not bound by the rules of a politician or a journalist. So, you know, when I say, 'She's a murderer,' it's because I believe she's a murderer, and that's all that's necessary for me to make those statements." >>>


What about the "psychological toll" of being a liberal minority? Black former secretary of agriculture under Bill Clinton, Mike Espy, faced an investigation over allegedly accepting bribes from lobbyists. (A jury later acquitted him.) And what about former Clinton Secretary of Labor Alexis Herman, investigated by the independent counsel for alleged influence peddling? (She was cleared of any wrongdoing.) What about the late former Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, whose death ended an independent counsel investigation on corruption? What about Clinton's former Hispanic Housing and Urban Development Secretary Henry Cisneros, indicted on 18 counts of conspiracy, giving false statements and obstruction of justice about payments he made to a former mistress? (He ultimately plea bargained down and pled guilty to one count of making false statements to the FBI, and was fined $10,000 with no jail time.)

Writers like Kaplan make the following statement about black conservatives. You cannot really support: low taxes; fewer regulations and licensing requirements; competition in schools; an end to the war on drugs; ending state-sponsored race-based preferences; privatization of Social Security; greater competition and less government influence in health care; immigration enforcement and reform; and the War on Terror as conducted under President Bush. A black person who thinks and reasons differently from others? Clearly, such a person suffers from "cognitive dissonance" due to a "psychological toll."

It's hard out there for a black conservative.

Larry Elder is an accomplished attorney, radio personality, syndicated columnist, best-selling author and host of daytime television's The Larry Elder Show

Copyright © 2006 Townhall.com

townhall.com