To: American Spirit who wrote (74427 ) 3/21/2006 1:12:43 AM From: Dan B. Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568 If only we hadn't found documents in Iraq stating the point of meeting with Al Qaeda, which Iraq did, you might have something. You still are talking about the lies Clinton told, the evidence presented in Clintons time, the conclusion of Clinton (i.e about the same as Bush's), and blaming Bush for creating some imaginary lie. If an article reports that there has been 1 confirmed deserter in Iraq since the war started, you claim there have been 8000. Who's doing the misrepresenting here? You and yours. You make statements with nothing to back you up. Simply Ludicrous. Islamic fundamentalist types in Iraq wanted to try to wipe out Kurds, as an example. So show me the chart detailing Saddams killings which backs up your claim that his butchery was 90% aimed at fundamentalists? Hell, it'd be more accurate to say he supported one brand of fundamentalists against another brand of fundamentalists 90% of the time. Fact is, in America we fundamentally believe in freedom, and it is perhaps MOST accurate to say that 90% of Saddam's butchery was against folk who believed somewhat as we do. Well known meetings between Iraq and Al Qaeda render your "view" that Saddam wanted to kill Osama rather than offer him asylum as was reported well before Bush's time, specious as hell, as does the fact that extremist terrorists were harbored in Iraq over the years (not to mention the extremist Palestinians encouraged with Saddam's money). Yet you ask us to believe he butchered mainly the very "fundamentalist" types which we in fact KNOW he supported again and again. You've been sold a HUGE bill of goods. Dan B.