Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (130634)	3/13/2006 8:06:43 AM
From: venividivici	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Sorry about that. New link to QQQQ chart. stockcharts.com[g,a]eaolyyay[d20060103,20060311][pc9!c50!i!f][vc60][ilb14!la12,26,9!lp21,13,8!lp13,8,5!lp8,5,3!ll14!lg][j70624773,y]&listNum=1 While I think we get some temporary upside today, here is part of a post I made on another board about why I don't think the flat count is correct (and hence the iii up is not on tap just yet), at least for the QQQQ: According to the flat rules at CyclePro (which are derived from Elliott Wave International, Prechter's outfit), the flat count doesn't really meet the criteria. I'm especially concerned that B didn't retrace enough of A (3rd flat rule) and that C didn't end a similar % below the bottom of A as it was below the top of A when it started (12th flat guideline). Which is just a roundabout way of saying that A should equal C. In fact, the equivalence of A and C is the basis for my own forecast, fwiw. geocities.com geocities.com